🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document offers a misguided assessment of Europe. The document asserts that unrestrained immigration and so-called "woke" policies pose an existential threat to European civilization. Yet, this perspective rests on a serious misreading of the reality. The true danger confronting Europe is not cultural but technological and economic lag.

The Stark Growth Divide Between the US and Europe

The data reveal a sobering picture. Between 2008 and 2023, American economic output surged by 87%, compared to a paltry thirteen and a half percent increase for the EU. During this time, European income per person dropped from 76.5% to just 50% of the American figure. Strikingly, even the poorest US state now has a greater average income than major EU nations like France and Italy.

Currently, about half of the global top fifty technology firms are American, while only four are European.

The Innovation Deficit: A Critical Problem

This widening economic gap stems from stronger efficiency gains in the US, largely due to technological innovation and better use of resources. The landscape of global tech dominance is overwhelmingly US-centric. In the last fifty years, hundreds of American startups have grown into companies valued at over ten billion dollars, versus only fourteen in Europe.

This disparity prompts a pressing question: In the race for tomorrow's sectors like AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing, what is Europe stand? Most analysts concede it is largely a two-horse race between the United States and China, with European nations starting at a significant handicap.

Root Causes of Europe's Technological Lag

Several key factors explain this technological divide.

• Financing Ecosystem: The US boasts a far deeper and more dynamic network for funding startups. Europe has yet to establish a genuine unified investment market, which limits the scale of emerging companies.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Excessive and fragmented regulation hamper European business. A American entrepreneur can launch a product under a single set of laws to access a market of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a larger population, is divided among 27 different national systems, creating significant internal barriers.
• Mindset Differences: Attitudes toward entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In parts of Europe, business failure was historically viewed with stigma, whereas in the United States, it is often seen as a badge of experience.
• Military Investment: The US benefits from a tightly woven innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. Europe's long-term lack of spending in defense has weakened its capacity for pioneering research.

A Path Forward: Grounds for Hopefulness

Despite these challenges, one can find causes for optimism. Policymakers are increasingly aware of the existential challenge and have begun to advance substantial change. Notable analyses on EU competitiveness and the single market highlight the need for sweeping changes.

With the right incentives and rule changes, Europe's strengths could support far greater degrees of commercial innovation.

The continent still possesses considerable strengths: skilled human capital, excellent schools and universities, and world-class research institutions. Alongside a large internal market and substantial household savings, these elements have the potential to unleash a new wave of venture creation.

Importantly, even if the EU does not become the leader in developing cutting-edge tech, it can still significantly boost economic output by adopting and adapting innovations from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

The European Union now faces a critical crossroads. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "gradually and then suddenly". So far, Europe's technological decline has been gradual. But, if it fails to take decisive action to address its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could turn into a rapid and permanent decline in global economic relevance.